ALL STROKE DIFFERENTIALS are per round. LEVEL 2 COMMON OPPONENTS include win/loss bonus.
RWLPP=Relative Win/Loss Percentage Points.
Comparison Summary - Rank Date: 06-01-2023 15:06:22 Division Opponent
School Adjusted Scoring Avg. Adjusted Drop Score Schedule
A:Georgia Tech 70.22 74.86 71.71
B:Texas A&M University 70.75 74.61 71.91
FILTER: Head-to-Head
GA Tech vs Texas A&M 4- 0- 0 +4.85

FILTER: Level 1 Common Opponents:
Common Opponent Georgia Tech vs Texas A&M University vs RWLPP
WinsLossesTiesSt/RdWinsLossesTiesSt/RdGA TechTexas A
C:Cal Poly 1 0 0 +15.00 1 0 0 +14.33 .520 .480
C:Long Island University 1 0 0 +21.67 1 0 0 +13.67 .740 .260
C:Alabama, U. of 3 1 0 +3.00 3 1 0 +0.46 .576 .424
C:Auburn University 1 1 0 +0.14 2 2 0 +0.09 .502 .498
C:Augusta 1 0 0 +17.00 1 0 0 +14.00 .590 .410
C:UCF 1 0 0 +6.00 2 0 0 +10.50 .355 .645
C:Clemson University 6 0 0 +9.17 2 0 1 +3.67 .705 .295
C:Duke University 4 0 0 +7.82 3 0 0 +2.90 .658 .342
C:East Tennessee State 4 0 0 +8.62 2 0 0 +4.00 .658 .342
C:Florida State Univ. 2 1 1 +2.77 0 2 0 -3.14 .927 .073
C:Florida, U. of 0 3 1 -1.64 2 3 0 -1.36 .492 .508
C:Furman University 1 0 0 +13.67 1 0 0 +5.67 .740 .260
C:Georgia Southern U. 1 0 0 +8.33 2 0 0 +1.17 .705 .295
C:Georgia, U. of 4 0 0 +3.69 4 0 0 +2.08 .548 .452
C:Louisville, U. of 3 0 0 +7.44 1 1 0 +5.33 .708 .292
C:Middle Tennessee 1 0 0 +15.00 1 0 0 +7.00 .740 .260
C:Mississippi St. U. 2 0 0 +9.29 4 0 0 +5.00 .609 .391
C:North Carolina, U of 3 3 0 -0.47 0 4 0 -5.69 .782 .218
C:So. Florida, U. of 1 0 0 +11.67 1 0 0 +9.50 .565 .435
C:Chattanooga 2 0 0 +6.43 1 0 0 +4.25 .575 .425
C:Tennessee, Univ. of 2 0 0 +2.33 0 3 0 -2.44 .903 .097
C:Vanderbilt Univ. 2 2 0 +0.31 1 2 0 -1.60 .682 .318
C:Virginia, U. of 5 0 0 +4.94 0 2 0 -2.29 1.000 .000
C:Wake Forest Univ. 5 0 0 +5.69 2 0 0 +4.17 .576 .424
C:Illinois, U. of 0 2 0 -2.71 0 2 0 -6.14 .603 .397
C:Northern Illinois 2 0 0 +11.67 2 0 0 +5.20 .694 .306
C:Ohio State University 3 0 0 +7.13 1 1 0 +1.71 .807 .193
C:Purdue University 2 0 0 +11.83 2 0 0 +8.80 .591 .409
C:Colorado 2 0 0 +8.71 1 0 0 +4.25 .644 .356
C:Oklahoma 2 2 1 +1.75 1 1 0 +0.86 .527 .473
C:Little Rock 1 0 0 +12.67 2 0 0 +5.50 .705 .295
C:Arkansas, U. of 3 0 0 +6.10 4 1 0 +3.81 .569 .431
C:Baylor 1 0 0 +8.75 2 0 0 +3.86 .637 .363
C:SMU 3 0 0 +10.00 3 0 0 +10.22 .493 .507
C:Texas 1 3 0 +1.27 1 2 0 -0.40 .550 .450
C:TCU 1 1 0 +1.50 2 0 0 +2.50 .335 .665
C:Texas Tech 1 2 0 +0.80 1 1 0 +0.71 .378 .622
C:Brigham Young Univ. 2 0 0 +9.29 2 1 0 +1.50 .744 .256
C:Colorado State University 1 0 0 +8.75 1 0 0 +4.25 .635 .365
C:University of Nevada 1 0 0 +16.33 1 0 0 +8.67 .730 .270
C:New Mexico 4 0 0 +7.08 4 1 0 +3.75 .610 .390
C:Utah, Univ. of 1 0 0 +12.33 1 0 0 +4.33 .740 .260
C:Arizona State University 1 2 0 -2.00 0 1 1 -1.71 .491 .509
C:Arizona, U. of 1 0 0 +4.33 1 1 0 -0.17 .760 .240
C:California, U. of 1 0 0 +4.67 3 0 0 +7.56 .393 .607
C:UCLA 2 0 0 +11.17 1 0 0 +15.00 .395 .605
C:Fresno State 1 0 0 +11.00 1 0 0 +5.67 .660 .340
C:Nevada Las Vegas 2 0 0 +8.50 3 0 0 +8.89 .478 .522
C:Oregon, U. of 3 1 0 +4.54 1 0 0 +4.25 .519 .481
C:Pepperdine Univ. 1 3 1 -2.36 1 3 0 -3.85 .545 .455
C:San Francisco, U. of 2 0 0 +6.86 1 0 0 +4.25 .588 .412
C:Santa Clara Univ. 1 0 0 +6.33 2 0 0 +9.50 .395 .605
C:Southern California 4 0 0 +8.67 2 0 0 +4.17 .655 .345
C:Saint Mary's (CA) 1 0 0 +11.00 2 0 0 +10.67 .500 .500
C:Stanford University 2 2 0 +0.46 0 2 0 -4.00 .759 .241
C:Washington State Univ. 1 0 0 +12.67 1 0 0 +8.00 .640 .360
C:Washington, U. of 4 0 0 +6.17 0 1 0 -1.00 .995 .005
C:San Diego State U. 3 0 0 +6.00 3 0 0 +2.44 .607 .393
C:Longwood University 1 0 0 +21.00 1 0 0 +13.00 .740 .260
TOTAL RWLPP: 53.032 31.968
DECISION: HTH + LEVEL 1 COMMON OPPONENTS
GEORGIA TECH:  78.39%     versus     Texas A&M University:  21.61%