ALL STROKE DIFFERENTIALS are per round. LEVEL 2 COMMON OPPONENTS include win/loss bonus.
RWLPP=Relative Win/Loss Percentage Points.
Comparison Summary - Rank Date: 06-01-2023 15:35:23 Division Opponent
School Adjusted Scoring Avg. Adjusted Drop Score Schedule
A:UT Arlington 73.33 79.24 73.49
B:UTSA 73.59 78.41 72.98
FILTER: Head-to-Head
UTA vs UTSA 1- 1- 0 -1.17

FILTER: Level 1 Common Opponents:
Common Opponent UT Arlington vs UTSA vs RWLPP
WinsLossesTiesSt/RdWinsLossesTiesSt/RdUTA UTSA
C:Furman University 0 1 0 -9.67 0 1 0 -4.67 .350 .650
C:Middle Tennessee 0 1 0 -2.33 1 2 0 -4.00 .550 .450
C:New Orleans, Univ. of 1 0 0 +10.00 1 0 0 +1.00 .750 .250
C:South Alabama, U. of 0 1 0 -7.33 1 1 0 -1.80 .209 .791
C:Southern Mississippi 1 1 0 -1.17 1 2 0 -2.11 .653 .347
C:Michigan, U. of 0 1 0 -3.67 1 0 0 +0.67 .120 .880
C:Colorado 0 1 0 -5.00 0 1 0 -3.00 .440 .560
C:Kansas City 1 0 0 +3.67 1 0 0 +2.50 .535 .465
C:Southern Illinois 1 0 0 +8.00 1 0 0 +5.33 .580 .420
C:Missouri St. U. 1 0 0 +12.00 2 0 0 +4.80 .706 .294
C:Wichita State Univ. 1 0 0 +2.33 1 0 0 +7.33 .350 .650
C:Little Rock 0 2 0 -9.33 0 3 0 -7.44 .443 .557
C:Arkansas State U. 0 0 1 +0.00 0 1 0 -9.00 .875 .125
C:Baylor 0 2 0 -12.00 0 2 0 -7.17 .355 .645
C:Houston 0 2 0 -5.67 0 5 0 -4.73 .472 .528
C:Lamar University 1 1 0 +1.00 1 2 0 +0.56 .638 .362
C:Louisiana Tech Univ. 0 1 0 -1.33 2 3 0 -0.67 .480 .520
C:Nicholls 2 0 0 +7.83 1 0 0 +21.33 .250 .750
C:North Texas, U. of 1 1 0 -1.17 3 3 0 -2.00 .525 .475
C:ULM 1 1 0 -2.33 0 3 0 -3.11 .648 .352
C:Rice University 1 1 0 -1.83 2 3 0 +1.43 .527 .473
C:Sam Houston State 0 3 0 -4.00 1 4 0 -6.33 .570 .430
C:SMU 0 1 0 -12.67 2 1 0 -1.67 .000 1.000
C:Texas State University 1 1 0 -3.50 0 3 0 -2.13 .584 .416
C:Louisiana 1 1 0 +2.83 2 2 0 +0.83 .560 .440
C:Stephen F. Austin State 3 1 0 +6.36 2 0 0 +10.60 .373 .627
C:TCU 0 1 0 -2.67 0 2 0 -9.33 .700 .300
C:Texas Rio Grande Valley 3 1 0 +3.91 2 0 0 +8.17 .372 .628
C:Hawaii, Univ. of 0 1 0 -2.00 0 0 1 +0.00 .315 .685
C:New Mexico 0 1 0 -2.67 1 1 0 -4.33 .425 .575
C:Southern Utah Univ. 3 0 0 +14.22 1 0 0 +18.50 .392 .608
C:UTEP 1 2 0 +0.33 2 0 0 +6.83 .045 .955
C:Wyoming, U. of 0 2 0 -7.17 0 1 0 -5.00 .435 .565
C:UC Santa Barbara 1 1 1 +1.33 1 0 0 +7.00 .205 .795
C:Fresno State 0 2 0 -9.67 0 1 0 -3.33 .310 .690
C:Sacramento State 2 0 0 +4.50 1 0 0 +8.67 .385 .615
C:Loyola Marymount Univ. 0 2 0 -3.50 2 1 0 +1.11 .112 .888
C:Nevada Las Vegas 0 1 0 -4.67 0 1 0 -10.33 .670 .330
C:New Mexico State U. 0 1 0 -4.67 1 3 0 -2.91 .447 .553
C:Pacific, U. of the 0 2 0 -3.17 1 0 0 +2.00 .095 .905
C:Saint Mary's (CA) 1 1 0 -1.83 0 1 0 -6.33 .760 .240
C:Utah State University 1 0 0 +4.00 1 0 0 +11.50 .275 .725
C:Oral Roberts Univ. 1 3 0 +0.00 1 2 0 -1.63 .549 .451
C:Troy University 0 1 0 -6.67 1 0 0 +0.33 .040 .960
C:Florida Atlantic U. 1 0 1 +0.83 1 2 0 +0.89 .748 .252
C:San Diego State U. 0 1 0 -10.33 0 1 0 -13.67 .600 .400
C:Francis Marion U. 0 1 0 -6.67 1 0 0 +9.67 .000 1.000
C:Abilene Christian U. 4 0 0 +4.83 4 0 0 +5.25 .488 .512
C:Central Arkansas 1 0 0 +6.33 1 0 0 +2.33 .620 .380
C:Incarnate Word, U of 2 0 0 +8.33 1 0 0 +8.67 .500 .500
C:Denver, U. of 1 0 0 +3.67 1 1 0 -0.17 .740 .260
C:Grand Canyon University 0 3 0 -6.67 1 0 0 +4.67 .000 1.000
C:Utah Tech University 2 0 0 +4.17 0 1 0 -0.67 .905 .095
C:Houston Christian Univ 2 0 0 +12.17 1 0 0 +12.67 .495 .505
TOTAL RWLPP: 29.550 35.450
DECISION: HTH + LEVEL 1 COMMON OPPONENTS
UT Arlington:  45.46%     versus     UTSA:  54.54%