ALL STROKE DIFFERENTIALS are per round. LEVEL 2 COMMON OPPONENTS include win/loss bonus.
RWLPP=Relative Win/Loss Percentage Points.
Comparison Summary - Rank Date: 05-27-2023 13:13:33 Division Opponent
School Adjusted Scoring Avg. Adjusted Drop Score Schedule
A:Lamar University 77.42 82.41 76.90
B:Utah Valley Univ. 76.68 83.90 75.87
FILTER: Head-to-Head
Lamar vs UtahValley 0- 1- 0 -5.33

FILTER: Level 1 Common Opponents:
Common Opponent Lamar University vs Utah Valley Univ. vs RWLPP
WinsLossesTiesSt/RdWinsLossesTiesSt/RdLamar UtahVal
C:Wyoming, U. of 0 1 0 -6.67 0 3 0 -4.56 .437 .563
C:Boise State Univ. 0 1 0 -18.00 0 4 0 -8.75 .250 .750
C:Texas El Paso, U. of 0 3 0 -11.67 0 2 0 -11.83 .505 .495
C:UT Rio Grande Valley 2 3 0 -2.20 2 0 0 +1.50 .129 .871
C:Idaho, University of 0 1 0 -9.33 0 4 0 -5.83 .395 .605
C:Montana, Univ. of 1 0 0 +1.67 2 0 0 +9.00 .270 .730
C:Weber State Univ. 1 1 0 -0.50 2 2 0 -3.36 .586 .414
C:Idaho State Univ. 2 0 0 +17.67 3 0 0 +11.38 .679 .321
C:Portland State Univ. 0 1 0 -9.00 2 1 0 +2.00 .000 1.000
C:North Dakota State 0 1 0 -3.67 1 3 0 -5.33 .550 .450
C:CSU-Northridge 0 1 0 -6.33 3 2 0 +3.43 .000 1.000
C:Sam Houston State 0 2 0 -22.33 0 1 0 -15.33 .290 .710
C:Tarleton State 1 2 0 -2.22 2 3 0 -1.07 .465 .535
C:Louisiana Monroe 0 2 0 -12.17 0 1 0 -24.33 .750 .250
C:UC Riverside 0 1 0 -8.67 0 5 0 -6.20 .426 .574
C:UC Davis 0 1 0 -11.00 0 2 0 -5.83 .345 .655
C:Southern Utah Univ. 1 0 0 +4.67 2 3 0 +3.60 .782 .218
C:Stephen F. Austin State 3 0 0 +11.00 3 0 0 +8.13 .586 .414
C:CSU Fullerton 0 1 0 -9.00 0 4 0 -7.17 .445 .555
C:Utah Tech University 1 0 0 +8.00 3 2 0 +4.50 .605 .395
C:UT Arlington 3 0 0 +5.56 1 0 0 +8.00 .447 .553
TOTAL RWLPP: 10.943 14.057
DECISION: HTH + LEVEL 1 COMMON OPPONENTS
Lamar University:  41.77%     versus     UTAH VALLEY UNIV.:  58.23%