ALL STROKE DIFFERENTIALS are per round. LEVEL 2 COMMON OPPONENTS include win/loss bonus.
RWLPP=Relative Win/Loss Percentage Points.
Comparison Summary - Rank Date: 05-27-2023 13:19:37 Division Opponent
School Adjusted Scoring Avg. Adjusted Drop Score Schedule
A:Oklahoma State 72.34 76.76 73.11
B:Texas A&M 71.59 76.08 73.12
FILTER: Head-to-Head
Okla. St. vs Texas A&M 0- 3- 1 -2.85

FILTER: Level 1 Common Opponents:
Common Opponent Oklahoma State vs Texas A&M vs RWLPP
WinsLossesTiesSt/RdWinsLossesTiesSt/RdOkla. STexas A
C:Alabama, University of 1 1 0 -0.40 2 0 0 +5.60 .185 .815
C:Arizona State 0 1 0 -6.67 1 0 0 +5.33 .000 1.000
C:Arizona 0 1 0 -0.25 2 0 0 +6.57 .035 .965
C:Auburn University 1 2 0 -2.00 2 3 0 -3.00 .530 .470
C:Baylor 4 0 0 +1.82 1 0 0 +3.00 .495 .505
C:UCLA 1 0 0 +6.67 4 1 0 +4.00 .560 .440
C:Duke University 3 0 0 +3.67 1 0 0 +3.00 .540 .460
C:Florida State Univ. 0 3 0 -2.67 0 1 0 -0.25 .428 .572
C:Florida, U. of 0 1 0 -4.00 3 1 0 +2.00 .060 .940
C:Georgia 1 1 0 -1.14 3 1 0 +3.17 .236 .764
C:Illinois, U. of 4 1 0 +4.87 2 0 0 +10.83 .331 .669
C:Iowa State 3 0 0 +2.11 2 0 0 +4.00 .453 .547
C:Kansas State 1 0 1 +12.50 1 0 0 +17.00 .365 .635
C:Kansas, Univ. of 1 0 1 +7.75 2 1 0 +8.11 .489 .511
C:Kentucky, U. of 0 2 0 -5.67 1 1 0 +1.67 .155 .845
C:LSU 1 2 0 -3.90 1 1 0 -0.57 .275 .725
C:Kent State 1 0 0 +1.33 1 0 0 +0.33 .530 .470
C:Michigan State University 1 0 0 +1.00 2 0 0 +2.29 .451 .549
C:Mississippi State 2 0 0 +1.29 4 2 0 -0.18 .544 .456
C:Ole Miss 2 2 0 -0.83 2 1 0 +1.10 .317 .683
C:Missouri 1 0 0 +16.33 1 0 0 +14.00 .570 .430
C:New Mexico, U. of 2 1 0 +4.10 3 0 0 +3.10 .510 .490
C:UNCW 1 0 0 +9.33 1 0 0 +2.67 .700 .300
C:North Texas, U. of 1 1 0 +2.17 2 1 0 +5.56 .273 .727
C:The Ohio State University 1 0 0 +4.67 1 0 0 +7.67 .410 .590
C:Oklahoma 6 1 0 +8.26 1 0 0 +19.00 .250 .750
C:Oregon State 2 0 0 +1.86 2 0 0 +6.57 .359 .641
C:Pepperdine 0 2 0 -1.57 2 1 0 +0.70 .182 .818
C:Purdue University 1 0 0 +3.33 0 1 0 -3.00 .940 .060
C:San Jose State Univ 1 1 0 -1.57 2 0 0 +4.57 .181 .819
C:South Carolina, U of 0 2 0 -2.14 2 2 0 -0.50 .326 .674
C:Southern California 0 2 0 -1.71 2 1 0 +1.60 .151 .849
C:Southern Methodist 2 1 1 +0.31 3 1 0 +4.15 .375 .625
C:Missouri State Univ. 1 0 0 +26.00 1 0 0 +26.00 .500 .500
C:Stanford University 0 2 0 -8.43 0 2 0 -5.14 .401 .599
C:Texas, University of 2 1 0 +0.38 2 1 0 -1.38 .553 .447
C:TCU 5 2 0 +3.30 1 0 0 +3.00 .529 .471
C:Texas Tech University 5 3 0 +1.43 4 0 0 +6.38 .331 .669
C:Tulsa, University of 4 0 0 +4.62 2 0 0 +8.00 .418 .582
C:Vanderbilt Univ. 2 1 0 +4.40 3 0 0 +7.20 .396 .604
C:Wake Forest Univ. 0 3 0 -8.56 0 3 0 -7.00 .453 .547
C:Denver, Univ. of 1 0 0 +5.67 1 0 0 +5.67 .500 .500
C:Northwestern University 1 1 0 -0.86 1 2 0 -2.20 .665 .335
C:Tennessee, U. of 2 1 0 +1.78 3 0 0 +9.67 .243 .757
C:Colorado 1 0 0 +8.00 1 0 0 +17.33 .250 .750
C:Arkansas, U. of 1 0 0 +4.00 3 1 0 +4.91 .463 .537
C:Sam Houston State 1 0 0 +8.67 1 0 0 +8.67 .500 .500
C:Louisville, Univ. of 1 0 0 +6.00 2 1 0 +8.25 .433 .567
C:North Carolina State 2 0 0 +1.00 2 0 0 +4.14 .406 .594
C:Maryland, U. of 1 1 0 -1.50 1 0 0 +5.67 .160 .840
C:Louisiana Monroe 1 0 0 +10.67 1 0 0 +10.67 .500 .500
C:UNLV 1 0 0 +9.33 1 0 0 +7.67 .550 .450
C:Augusta 1 1 0 -1.17 1 0 0 +3.00 .250 .750
C:Texas State University 3 0 0 +9.67 3 0 0 +17.89 .253 .747
C:Virginia, Univ. of 1 0 0 +1.00 1 1 0 +1.50 .610 .390
C:Charlotte 1 0 0 +10.33 2 0 0 +19.33 .240 .760
C:UTSA 3 0 0 +12.89 2 0 0 +20.50 .282 .718
C:Clemson University 2 1 0 -0.40 3 0 0 +4.30 .339 .661
C:Houston 3 0 0 +4.33 2 0 0 +11.33 .300 .700
C:Virginia Tech 2 1 0 +4.00 1 0 0 +6.00 .440 .560
C:Georgia Southern U. 1 0 0 +8.00 1 0 0 +11.00 .410 .590
TOTAL RWLPP: 31.539 51.461
DECISION: HTH + LEVEL 1 COMMON OPPONENTS
Oklahoma State:  28%     versus     TEXAS A&M:  72%